Moral judgment: Acts, omissions, and rules
نویسنده
چکیده
3 Omission, action, and related issues 4 3.1 Determinants of omission bias . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1.1 Perceived causality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1.2 Physical proximity, contact, and personal force . . . . . . 6 3.1.3 Protected values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2 Related biases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.1 Indirectness and the double effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.2 Agent relativity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.3 Naturalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
منابع مشابه
Cognitive Attraction Theory and Moral Judgment
The present article deals with the processes that underpin moral judgment. In the specialized literature, some concepts are proven to be important mechanisms that build up the moral judgment. For instance, intuition, emotion, reasoning, moral rules, deontology and consequentialism. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive framework, which puts together those key concepts in a clear picture. ...
متن کاملA person-centered approach to moral judgment.
Both normative theories of ethics in philosophy and contemporary models of moral judgment in psychology have focused almost exclusively on the permissibility of acts, in particular whether acts should be judged on the basis of their material outcomes (consequentialist ethics) or on the basis of rules, duties, and obligations (deontological ethics). However, a longstanding third perspective on m...
متن کاملActs and omissions: killing and letting die.
Gillon asks what, if any, moral importance resides in the distinction between killing and letting die in the context of medical care. He considers and rejects the acts and omissions doctrine, which claims that actions (killing) resulting in some undesirable end are in general morally worse than failures to act (allowing to die) that have the same result. He also refutes the argument that the ...
متن کاملRunning head: PROTECTED VALUES AND FRAMING EFFECTS Protected Values: No Omission Bias and No Framing effects
Previous studies suggest that people holding protected values show a bias against harmful acts as opposed to harmful omissions (omission bias). Protected values (PVs) have been seen as grounded in deontological moral rules to avoid causing harm. The present study 1) investigated the relationship between PVs and acts of commission versus omission in risky choices, using a paradigm where act and ...
متن کاملPrincipled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
Three studies test eight hypotheses about (1) how judgment differs between people who ascribe greater vs. less moral relevance to choices, (2) how moral judgment is subject to task constraints that shift evaluative focus (to moral rules vs. to consequences), and (3) how differences in the propensity to rely on intuitive reactions affect judgment. In Study 1, judgments were affected by rated agr...
متن کامل